Why The Release Of Spike Lee's 'Do The Right Thing' Was Surrounded In Controversy

Publish date: 2024-04-07

Hall of famed-director Spike Lee's paintings has been subversive, intimate, uncomfortably related, and transferring. While he has feuded with many other notable artists, none of them can deny just how influential and necessary his paintings has been on the cinema panorama. But more than that, Spike's racial-justice-themed movies have audiences round the global to reevaluate their place in the international or, in the case of his topics, make them really feel like their voice is being heard. However, that is not been without its set of controversies.

When Spike's 1989 film Do The Right Thing got here out, there was serious controversy surrounding it. Not in contrast to the tragic events that spurred the racial justice actions in 2014, 2019, and 2020, Do The Right Thing featured the loss of life of a Black guy that spawned riots and acts of violence. But why did those depictions in this movie anger the critics so much and what was Spike in reality trying to succeed in?

Why Spike Set Out To Make The Film That He Did

In an interview with Empire Online, Spike Lee claimed that he wanted to seize the racial rigidity that existed in the late '80s in Brooklyn.

"I wanted to do a film that was about New York City at that particular time," Spike mentioned. "The racial climate, the historical hostility between the African-American community and the Italian-American community. It was based on stuff that was happening. The film is dedicated to, specifically, individuals and families who are no longer here because of the NYPD."

In Do The Right Thing, the tension between the communities grows till one of the Black characters is brutally murdered (via a chokehold) by means of a white police officer. The result is a violent second of anger, catharsis, and retribution for the innocent lives misplaced.

According to an article by Vulture, a couple of critics denounced Spike and his film for encouraging violent acts as revenge for injustice. But the feeling of rage was an original one. It has been a feeling that was reaching a boiling level in the late '80s because it has in 2014, 2019, 2020 and for masses of years prior to that.

"If you look historically at the uprising that happened in America, of African-Americans, it wasn’t like black folk woke up one morning and said, 'Let’s burn it down'", Spike defined to Empire Online. "There’s a tipping point. The tipping point for Mookie [in Do The Right Thing] was to see his best friend, Radio Raheem, get choked to death. I made that movie in 1989. Then to see a videotape of Eric Garner [who was killed by a police officer in 2014], it affected me so much I called up my editor, Barry Brown. I said, 'We got to do something.' We put together this clip where we cut back and forth between Radio Raheem’s murder — fictitious — with the real murder of Eric Garner. It’s eerie how similar it is. We put it up on the internet."

Related: Spike Lee Explains What Made The Research For ‘Da 5 Bloods’ So Special

The Critique Of The Film Happened Early

In reality, critics began attacking Do The Right Thing as soon because it debuted at the Cannes Film Festival again in May 1989.

"When Do The Right Thing premiered in Cannes, there was pressure put on Tom Pollock, who was then the president of Universal Pictures, not to release it," Spike defined. "Especially in summer time [when the movie was set], because this film would incite black people to riot and run amok."

While Universal didn't succumb to the power, some critics had a field day seeking to tear the challenge (and Spike) down.

"It is Spike Lee himself — in the role of Sal’s deliveryman — who starts the riot by throwing a garbage can through the store’s window, one of the stupider, more self-destructive acts of violence I’ve ever witnessed (if black kids act on what they see, Lee may have destroyed his career in that moment)," Joe Klein wrote for New York Magazine after writing, "When some white policemen arrive and kill a black boy, the crowd, enraged, riots, taking revenge on the nearest white property. Rather than attacking the police, the rioters attack a symbolic target, and that part of the movie is hard to justify. Defenders will say this is what happens in the ghetto after a police atrocity, but Lee appears to be endorsing the outcome."

And this was just a style of what some of the critics had been announcing... Although, it must be mentioned that a few critics, including Roger Ebert and Peter Travers, defended Spike and praised the movie.

"A lot of critics were just trying to find something incendiary to write about," cinematographer Ernest R. Dickerson stated. "It was pure ignorance on their part. Nothing ever came of it, of not really knowing what African-American film is, and what it’s capable of. It’s not something that will cause the destruction of American society, but actually contribute to a better America. Best thing you could ask for, to have that last laugh."

Related: Spike Lee, Thank You For Not Giving 'Da 5 Bloods' 'The Irishman' De-Ageing Treatment

"Research the articles by David Denby, Joe Klein, and Jack Kroll," Spike mentioned of Do The Right Things' most harsh critics. "Basically, what they said was, blood was going to be on my hands because black people were going to riot and it was going to be my fault. It was very racist reviews. If you write that, you’re saying that black people don’t have the intelligence enough to distinguish between what they see on screen and what’s real life. Not one of them has apologized or said what they wrote was wrong, with a capital W. I’m upset 30 years later."

Next: Inside Spike Lee's Relationship With His Kids, Satchel And Jackson

ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7tbTErZ%2Bippeoe6S7zGiuobFdqbWmedGeo56Zo5p6sLKMrKeio5Viuaax0mabqGWknbJuvsign61lpJ22r7OMsJisZaOqv7O71Kebnpxdnrtur86nq6unppq%2FtMWO